Glenys Glover B.Com, CA

Contents

2007-2013

Tasman District Councillor

 

Glenys Glover

Glenys Glover

I stood for the Tasman District Council because I had a real interest in good planning, particularly as it affected the community's connection with the environment. I also had the time and a family connection to serving the local community (my father had been a councillor and Deputy Mayor Richmond Borough Council during the 1970s).

The first term was very much a learning time, getting to grips with process, people, information flows and sub-committee structures. It was also a time to forge alliances that might be useful when it came to matters that I really wanted to influence. The second term was more a matter of taking these lessons and putting them into action. Certainly, I felt more influential in the second term.

I learnt that following the money was a quick way to understand some of the constraints that council operated under. In Resource Management Act issues I learnt that decisions were complex trade-offs between various interested parties. While I accepted climate change as a given, other councillors were still debating whether it was a relevant consideration when looking at long-term planning changes.

As a business owner and accountant, my experiences of the world were quite different from my colleagues. Blending in the strong community views with a commercial oversight was very challenging at times. In such circumstances the Chief Executive's experience and guidance was critical to ensuring good decision-making.

During my time I was one of three women on council, with the other ten councillors being men. There was a real effort by the then Mayor to find a balance between women representation on Council, their representation on sub-committees and the number of women voters in the community. A woman chaired the Community Services Committee, a very traditional appointment. More women councillors would have meant more influence, especially in the critical areas of finance and infrastructure management, representing 70% plus of total council costs. 

This was published in: Women Decision-Makers Nelson and Tasman 1944 -2018, p. 33. Compiled by Dr Shelley Richardson, Elaine Henry, Gail Collingwood, Hilary Mitchell.

Suffrage 125 Logo

 2018

Do you have a story about this subject? Find out how to add one here.

Comment on this story

Post your comment

Comments

No one has commented on this page yet.

RSS feed for comments on this page | RSS feed for all comments